…… especially when trying to address
performance issues of your sales force.
On February 6, 2013 Sales training
industry experts Brian Lambert, Geoffrey James, John Roy and Scott Hudson
discussed “The good, bad & ugly of Challenger Sales Model”. The Model is
described in the book “The Challenger Sale, Taking Control of the Customer
Conversation” by Mathew Dixon and Brent Adamson of the Corporate Executive
Board. The model is gathering
significant attention not least from the way the book is marketed.
Brian Lambert mentioned in the
introduction to the discussion some serious performance issues that sales
forces need fixing. Yet one of the main conclusions of the experts’ discussion
was that there is no such thing as a silver bullet to fix these sales
performance issues.
Why should you care?
Every year, billions of dollars are
spent for sales training. A big portion of these training efforts does not show
adequate returns. In many cases, this lack of return is caused by executives
having the newest concept for Sales introduced into their organizations with
the hope of having found the silver bullet to solve sales force performance
issues.
Why do we need to be reminded of this?
The way the book, “The Challenger
Sale”, is marketed, fosters this
illusion of being a silver bullet to improve sales performance. Just have a look at the jacket of the book. There,
Neil Rackham, the author of SPIN Selling, praises “The Challenger Sale” as: “The
most important advance in selling for many years”.
Neil Rackham developed his SPIN
Selling model on the basis of an extensive research. When it was first presented, it drew a lot of
criticism from the then established sales trainers because it put into question
many of their believes and teachings. In hind side, we know that, for many
contexts, these teachings have proven to be inadequate.
The Challenger Sales Model is also
based on research though not as extensive as the one undertaken by Rackham. The
Challenger Sales Model also is often put in questions by today’s sales experts.
The discussion by industry experts, mentioned above, is just one of many
examples. Can you see the power of putting Neil Rackham’s quote on the jacket?
For those knowing the industry, it is a clear message: If you criticize the
Challenger Sales Model, you risk being seen like those trainers critiquing SPIN
Selling in an attempt to protect their turfs.
The article published in the Harvard
Business Review on the Challenger Sales Model is another element of how the
book is marketed. In this article, Dixon
et al. announce nothing less than the
death of Solution Selling. For the benefit of the doubt, let’s assume they
meant Solution Selling as a generic term.
“Solution Selling” is also a registered trademark of a widely used
commercial sales methodology. You can imagine that the owners of this
methodology were not exactly happy about this article. From my perspective, the
research done for “The Challenger Sale” actually confirms a very basic concept
of “Solution Selling”, namely to focus on prospects who are not yet looking for
a solution. That is essentially what a challenger does.
Last week, I found yet another
example s of the marketing strategy for the book. This example is on audience targeting. In the British Airways magazine “Business
Life”, I found this article discussing the book. This last example triggered the idea for the
title of this blog post.
Why is an airline magazine well suited to diffuse the message about “The
Challenger Sale”?
Many executives are frequent flyers. They often do some background
reading while traveling by plane. Articles,
like the one in the British Airways magazine, draw easily their attention. Most
executives are rather displeased with the performance of their sales forces and
this for good reasons when you look issues presented by Brian Lambert. During the experts' discussions, one of the panelists
mentioned that most executives have not risen to their position through the
sales ranks which makes them though particularly vulnerable to believe in
messages transmitted in such articles.
At first glance, and especially if
one has not had much exposure to the sales function, articles such as the one
in the British Airways magazines appear rather plausible. Inspired by the article, executives might next
buy the book or immediately have somebody looking into how this apparently new
great model about sales could be introduced to their company’s sales
force. As mentioned above, there is a
high likelihood that such an initiative will end up in another disappointing
experience of a sales training initiative not producing the expected results.
Here is why.
The definition of Sales might look simple
In an earlier post, I already made an
attempt to present a simple definition. Thanks to a discussion with my friend
David Ednie, I found a more refined and comprehensive version:
Sales means having interactions
• with
the right person
• about
the right subject
• at
the right moment
• in
the right way
to reach mutually beneficial
decisions for the seller and the buyer.
Mastering Sales is less trivial
To understand who the right
person and what the right subject is, one needs methodologies.
To know when it is the right moment to interact, one needs a process.
Skills are needed to know the right way how to interact. Already this
little list demonstrates that there are many facets to be mastered by a well
performing sales force. There is simply
not one book that can cover all these aspects.
Recommendations
First, remember that books are
primarily written for authors. Especially in the sales training industry, which
is largely lacking a body of scientific knowledge, books are written to
establish ones authority about the subject. Content presenting an apparent
comprehensive model or system based on own research seems to be best suited to
establish credibility. Yet content alone does not sell the book. You need
clever marketing. The way “The Challenger Sale “is marketed is an excellent
show case how to boost sales for a book effectively. Whether this goes to the detriment of credibility,
is a different subject.
Second, we need executives being
more involved in initiatives to improve the performance of sales forces. Yet we
should stop creating allusions that one book contains the silver bullet how to
do it. Doing so, we set them up for failure.
Third, in most books written about
Sales, you will find some aspects worthwhile to be considered. Only wise and
careful integration of such aspects into a current selling system has a chance
of bringing the expected improvement of performance. Integrating does though not mean adding.
Usually some edges need be filed off from the new concept and elements from the
existing system need to be removed or modified. In case you consider the whole
system described in a book as being attractive to deploy in your organization,
just be aware that integration of a whole model is more complex, and the chance
for causing disruptions in the current selling system, negatively impacting
performance, is increasing.
What nonsense! List the flaws you have found with the SPIN model, and the evidence to disprove SPIN Validity.
ReplyDeleteI have not said that SPIN Selling is flawed; To the contrary. What I meant to say is that those criticizing SPIN Selling at the time were proven wrong. What I am however doubting is that the Challenger Sales Model can claim to be a similar break through as SPIN selling was.
ReplyDeleteIgnore Brian, he's an irritating internet troll always banging the table about evidence based sales, and yet when you go to his website, you see that he has no evidence for the effectiveness of his training. In fact, if you go to his website, he looks like he's just barely scrapping by.
ReplyDelete